South Carolina Episcopalians
          An Independent Journal of News & Commentary

       
_________________________________________________________________  
             
This site is not affiliated with the Episcopal Church or any of its dioceses


                                                                                                       
                                     

    Welcome to Our Home Page!
     
                                        

May 18, 2016
No Ruling from State's Supreme Court Today
Speculation:  High Court could be holding back on controversial cases until after new Chief Justice is elected next week


Another Wednesday morning has come and gone with no decision from the state’s Supreme Court on the mega-lawsuit brought by former Bishop Mark Lawrence against the Episcopal Church. 

The Court normally publishes its opinions on Wednesday mornings, and for the past 34 Wednesdays current and former South Carolina Episcopalians have watched anxiously for a decision on whether Lawrence and his followers will be allowed to leave the Episcopal Church with property and financial assets valued at more than $500 million.

Lawrence brought the lawsuit in January 2013 and, in January 2015, prevailed in a lower court in which Dorchester County Judge Diane Goodstein gave him and his followers the whole shooting match.  The Episcopal Church appealed, and the following September the five justices of the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case.

Anxiety Running High

There is much speculation on why the Court is taking so long to issue an opinion. 

One reason maybe that it’s a complicated case, and legal precedence unique to South Carolina could influence the Court to take a different path than its counterparts in Virginia and Georgia.  In those states, their highest courts considered similar cases by breakaway groups and ruled in favor of the Episcopal Church. 

Among the challenges for the Church is a related case in 2009, in which the Court found that the Church’s 1979 “Dennis Canon” was not particularly compelling evidence that parishes in South Carolina had consented for all time to be part of the Episcopal Church. 

While Lawrence has laid claim to the nearly 40 parishes that have joined him in the lawsuit, he also claims that he and his followers own the corporate entity known as the “Diocese of South Carolina” and all of its assets.  This claim to the corporate entity is probably the weakest part of Lawrence’s lawsuit, but it is possible that anomalies in the legal status of some of the older parishes backing him might allow them to leave the Church.

Even attorneys for Lawrence have given up on the hope that the Court will uphold Goodstein's ruling.  If the justices were planning on siding with her, they wouldn't be taking over eight months to say so.

Electing a New Chief

A second reason may be the more practical. 

Next week the Legislature is scheduled to elect a new Chief Justice to succeed the incumbent, Costa Pleicones.  Associate Justice Don Beatty, the Court's next most senior judge, is likely to be elected by a unanimous vote. 

However, earlier this year, Tea Party Republicans were rumored to be looking for an alternate candidate, whom they hoped would not be as “liberal” as Beatty.   While few in the legal profession consider Beatty a liberal, he is black and that is enough for some of the state’s rightwing politicians to mistrust him.

The case involving the Episcopal Church is going to ruffle feathers regardless of its outcome, so there is speculation that the Court might just be holding back on making any controversial rulings until Beatty is safely elected.  That could happen on May 25th. 

Fueling this speculation is the Court’s foot-dragging over the past seven weeks on an even more controversial case regarding the powers of a special prosecutor who is investigating members of the Legislature for corruption.  In that case, the issues are relatively straight forward, leading some to wonder about the Court’s motives in waiting to rule.



May 5, 2016
ACNA Hierarchy Headed to Mount Pleasant June 20-24
Self-styled "Anglican Church of North America" will continue its courtship of the followers of ex-Bishop Lawrence at the controversial St. Andrew's Episcopal Church

M
OUNT PLEASANT- The governing bodies of the breakaway "Anglican Church of North America" will convene in Mount Pleasant this summer to figure out a way forward after failing in their attempt to earn a place in the Anglican Communion last January.  
 

ACNA's Executive Committee, Provincial Council, and College of Bishops will all have meetings during the week of June 20th and the public is invited to join them.  The breakaway group, comprised largely of disaffected Episcopalians and members of the Anglican Church of Canada, are led by Foley Beach, who bears the title of "Archbishop."  It is not clear if he is still calling himself a "Primate," which is the title reserved for recognized leaders of the 38 Anglican provinces.

A key factor in the group's choice of South Carolina for this meeting is its ongoing courtship of parishes loyal to ex-Bishop Mark Lawrence.  Should the state's Supreme Court allow them to leave the Episcopal Church with their property, ACNA's prestige and credibility would be greatly enhanced if these parishes chose to join up.  Lawrence's lieutenants have been pushing the parishes to discern a path forward that would produce that outcome. 

The case is currently pending before the Court, where a ruling could come at any time.

ACNA has been insisting for years that it is the true representative of traditional Anglicanism in the United States, but that is not the way the Archbishop of Canterbury saw it in late 2014 when he described ACNA as "a separate Church ... not in the Communion."

The primates similarly sent them packing at their meeting at Canterbury Cathedral last January when they reaffirmed their intention to "walk together" with the Episcopalians in spite of substantial differences over issues related to human sexuality.

Without an Anglican identity, ACNA's leaders must figure out who they are and what they believe in.

The question of joining ACNA is not a simple one for Lawrence parishes.  Historian Dr. Ron Caldwell explores just some of the issues they must address in his thoughtful analysis found here.

Register for the meeting by clicking here



April 28, 2016
Breakaway Diocese of Pittsburgh Rejects Unsuitable Favorite Son to Succeed Retiring Bishop Duncan
In the eyes of ACNA, beloved priest and Duncan loyalist ranks right up there with gays, women priests, and transgendered people


Contrarian clergy and lay people in ACNA’s Diocese of Pittsburgh did not easily surrender their independence to their Church’s hierarchy at last Saturday's special convention, but they finally gave in and abandoned a popular favorite son to succeed retiring Bishop Robert Duncan. 

The controversial Duncan stepped down as the leader of the self-styled “Anglican Church of North America” in late 2014, but stayed on as bishop of what remains of the renegade “diocese” he tried to lead out of the Episcopal Church.

Five months ago Duncan informed the diocese that he wanted to retire.  He and his Standing Committee then commissioned a search for a successor and issued a call for a special convention to elect him last Saturday.

What happened next is a lesson for South Carolina breakaways

As it turned out, the story of the convention was more about the election of the new bishop and what it says about the ACNA than a celebration of Duncan’s turbulent years at the helm. 

Its lessons are particularly relevant to breakaway parishes in South Carolina as they are under a lot of pressure to merge with ACNA, if they win their current legal battle in the State’s Supreme Court.

Here’s the gist of what happened.  

The discernment process that followed Duncan's announcement produced a predictable slate of five candidates (all men, of course).  However, many in the diocese were distressed that the name of The Rev. Jonathan Millard - a popular priest, long-time diocesan leader, and Duncan loyalist - was not on the slate.

A former lawyer in his native England, Millard has an impressive resume that should warm the hearts of any of the remaining breakaway groups  He studied theology at Oxford University and then went on to seminary at Wycliffe Hall.  He served as a long-time rector of two parishes in the Pittsburgh diocese, and rallied the secessionists eight years ago in support of Duncan’s war against the Episcopal Church. 

Millard's parish describes him this way: “Raised in a Christian family, Jonathan cannot remember a time when he did not know God. Through the joys and sorrows of life and ministry, Jonathan is surer today than ever of God’s grace, love and power to do abundantly far more than we can ask or imagine. Jonathan is passionate about people, preaching and seeing lives transformed by God.”

Considered unsuitable, Millard was nominated from the convention floor and became the instant favorite

By the time the delegates convened last weekend, Millard’s friends and supporters announced plans to nominate him from the floor... and he immediately became the frontrunner. 

Millard easily led in the voting among both clergy and lay delegates on the first two ballots.  On the third ballot he was in a virtual tie with the surging candidacy of James Hobby, the eventual winner who is currently a priest serving a breakaway group in Georgia.

On the fourth ballot, Hobby gained a slight edge over Millard, who then saw the handwriting on the wall and withdrew in the interest of unity.

In all likelihood, Millard would have been elected as the successor to Duncan, his long-time friend and mentor, except that he is considered unsuitable to be a bishop in the eyes of God… and the ACNA leadership to whom God speaks. 

He is recently divorced.
 


Authority of ACNA's laity has largely been given over to a handful of very narrow-thinking bishops

That’s right, in the Biblically-literal world of ACNA, The Rev. Mr. Millard ranks right up there with other undesirables like gays, women priests, and transgendered people.

In news reports about the convention, it is clear that Bishop Duncan aggressively campaigned among the delegates against his friend.  He even held a private meeting with delegates to warn them that ACNA’s college of bishops would most likely reject a divorced nominee for bishop. 

According to the Pittsburgh Gazette, “Before balloting on Saturday morning, delegates (sic) held a closed-door discussion about the ramifications of the candidacy of Rev. Millard. While pastor of a large parish and experienced in administration, he had been divorced last year after an extended separation. Bishop Duncan cautioned that, given the bishops’ emphasis on 'the lifelong permanence of holy matrimony,' it would be a challenge for them to confirm such an election.”

In the ACNA, standing committees, where lay people might have some say, have no role in the election process like they do in the Episcopal Church.  Elections like the one last Saturday in Pittsburgh only create an illusion that the ACNA is a democratic entity. 

The reality is that the elections of ACNA's bishops are largely the creatures of dark, closed-door meetings of its College of Bishops, who have the impression that the way to proclaim the life-giving Gospel is to exclude people whom they judge to be unacceptable in the eyes of a loving and forgiving God.

The Rev. Canon Mark Harris writes this about the Pittsburgh election on the weblog, Preludium:

"Now it may take time for the hierarchy of ACNA to get this, because the bishops in ACNA are not as easily informed by the laity - but the handwriting is on the wall, the signs are there.  In spite of all the muttering about truths once delivered of the saints and God's word written, the reality is that divorce is no longer a clear sign of unsuitability.

"Is divorce in the life of a candidate a matter that requires further question? Of course. But (it) is no longer a clear sign of unsuitability.

"In North America regular church citizens are not likely to appreciate being told what to do and who is suitable. As seems to have been true for all Anglican and Anglican-like bodies in North America, ACNA will have to come to terms with being IN North America.

"Good luck with that."

You can read more about the Pittsburgh convention at
Episcopal Café, and Preludium.


April 22, 2016

GAFCON Should Get With the Anglican Communion or Get Out
Renegade primates don't pay their way, attend meetings, or even engage other provinces, while loyal Anglicans under them are prevented from participating in the Communion

GAFCON is an unsanctioned affiliation of ultraconservative Primates who can't seem to decide if they are in the Anglican Communion or not. 

Most of this handful of provincial leaders hail from Africa, but some come from South America and Asia.  They include the largest and smallest of Anglicanism's 38 province, and are bound together by a fear of homosexuality, empowered women, and a smug self-righteous that only they know the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

However, GAFCON's hardcore leadership lies with the Anglican provinces of Rwanda, Uganda, Nigeria, and Kenya. 

For years, these four have repeatedly ignored Communion rules about respecting borders and underwritten legal efforts to poach parishes from the Episcopal Church.  They have often treated follow primates, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, with ridicule and disrespect, staged boycotts of Communion gatherings, and issued self-important "communiques" proclaiming themselves the true voices of Christ in the Anglican Communion..

Their ecclesiastical structures have rotted as they wrapped themselves tightly in the political agendas of autocratic strongmen that rule their countries.  They have often supported outrageous laws that have led to the persecution of gays and oppression of women. They have corrupted their Churches by openly accepting accept cash payments from those political leaders, as well as other gifts like luxury automobiles.  They have been responsible for inciting fear and hostility toward Muslims that have often been linked to violence and death.

Why the followers of Mark Lawrence entrusted their future to this gang in 2014 is beyond the ability of any intelligent person to comprehend.

Add "deadbeat" to their resumes

At the recently concluded meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council meeting in Zambia, some important revelations about the GAFCON primates raised questions about whether they should even be in the Communion.

The most significant of these was that they haven't been paying their dues. 

- The province of Nigeria, which claims to include millions of followers, last paid anything to the Communion in 2011, when it kicked in the equivalent of $14,200 toward the Communion's nearly $3 million budget. 

- Uganda, The Congo, Sudan, and West Africa have given nothing in the past five years.

- There is also no record of Rwanda or Tanzania, giving anything in the past two years.

GAFCON primates preside over divided houses

However, equally as important, is the emergence of growing opposition to the leadership of these hardliners within their own provinces. 

A nasty spat erupted earlier this month when the ACC delegates from Kenya had to sneak out of their country to attend the meeting in Zambia and avoid the wrath of their Primate, Eliud Wabukala, who is also the leader of GAFCON.  Last year Wabukala found himself and his henchmen in court over what some of his own clergy believe was an attempt to fix an election for bishop for his loyalists.

In Uganda, many Anglicans have been scandalized by the Church's support for anti-homosexual laws that have made even seeming to be a homosexual punishable by lengthy jail terms.  Priests and even bishops who expressed sympathy for gays and lesbians, found themselves denounced and out of work.

Despite year of demonizing of the Episcopal Church by the GAFCON, the three Episcopal Church delegates to the ACC meeting in Zambia said they were treated like "honored guests" and celebrated as foreign dignitaries. 

Far from being boycotted as GAFCON had urged, 5,000 African Anglicans showed up for the ACCs opening Eucharist, with most hanging around afterwards to sing and dance for hours with their Anglican brothers and sisters from around the world.  In fact, the Rt. Rev. James Tengatenga, the departing leader of the ACC and a retired bishop of southern Malawi, let it be more than a month ago that the Episcopalians had a "right and responsibility" to attend the ACC meeting.


April 19, 2016
Episcopalians Upbeat after ACC Gathering in Zambia
Letter from our three delegates say they were treated as "honored guests" by the Province of Central Africa

If there is bitter hostility toward the Episcopal Church in the Anglican Communion, it has not been evident at the recently concluded Anglican Consultative Council Meeting in Lusaka, Zambia.  Seventy delegates from across the Communion worshiped, prayed, debated, worked, and even danced together for nearly two weeks in what appeared to be a joyous celebration of worldwide Anglicanism.

The one possibility of dissention came in the form of a resolution "accepting" a report from January's Primates Meeting, but it was eventually withdrawn... apparently with the agreement of the Archbishop of Canterbury.  At that meeting the Primates had voted to apply "consequences" to the Episcopal Church for its approval of marriage rites for same-gender couples.

Delegates from three of the 38 provinces boycotted the ACC meeting because the three Episcopal Church delegates were enthusiastically welcomed by the Council's leadership.  However, the boycott only seemed to underscore the extent to which the hardline anti-gay Provinces have become marginalized.

Read full letter here


April 18, 2016
Anglican Consultative Council Sidesteps Confrontation with Primates over "Consequences" against the Episcopal Church
Episcopalians quietly taking a lower profile, while Primates' action in January languishes


Members of the Anglican Consultative Council, one of four Instruments of Unity that govern the Anglican Communion, refused to respond to a declaration by its 38 Primates (provincial leaders) in January that "consequences" should be imposed on the Episcopal Church for its support of same-gender marriage.

ACC delegates, meeting in Zambia for the past week and a half, generally felt the Primates had overstepped their authority in "requiring" that representatives of the Episcopal Church be excluded from representing the Communion on policy, theological, or ecumenical matters for three years. 

ACC delegates did approve the Primates' call to the Communion's 38 provinces to "walk together,"  but a separate resolution formally "accepting" the Primates statement was quietly withdrawn.

Even ACC delegates, who do not support same-gender marriage, were concerned that the singling out the policies of an individual province - like the Episcopal Church - would set an unwelcomed precedent for the Communion in the future.

The four Instruments of Unity also include the Primates Meeting, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the every-tenth-year Lambeth Conference of all bishops.  All are semi-independent, somewhat autonomous bodies that pledge to respect and cooperate each other, but they do not govern each other.

Generally, it appears that, while the Episcopalians have no plans to withdraw from active participation in the affairs of the Communion, they do seem to be avoiding high profile involvements that might exacerbate tensions.  Earlier this month Connecticut Bishop Ian Douglas withdrew his name from consideration as the new leader of the ACC.

Read full story here


April 16, 2016
"Bishop, Reformer, and Martyr":  Canterbury Cathedral to Honor Murdered South Carolina Bishop

The life of William Alexander Guerry will be celebrated annually at the heart of the Anglican Communion and in a service of remembrance in June 2018

CHARLESTON - Canterbury Cathedral, the center of Anglicanism for more than five centuries, is set to honor the life and martyrdom of the late South Carolina Bishop William Alexander Guerry, according to Dean J. Michael A. Wright of Grace Episcopal Cathedral this morning.  Guerry was one of the longest serving bishops in the Episcopal Church in South Carolina, but for years racial politics have kept his part of Episcopal Church history on a back burner. 

A native of Charleston and a graduate of what is now Porter-Gaud School, Guerry was assassinated in 1928 by a fellow clergyman, who believed the Bishop's work to include African Americans in the full life of the Church was undermining God's plan for white supremacy. 

In recent years, a resurgence of interest in Bishop Guerry have been championed by Archdeacon Callie Walpole and Diocesan Chancellor Thomas Tisdale, both of whom have ties to the University of the South, where Guerry was once a professor of homiletics.

Among the few memorials to Guerry is a special chapel in Grace Cathedral, where his story continues to be told.

Canterbury Dean Robert Willis learned about the murdered bishop last week when he visited Grace and expressed interest in the origins of the Chapel.  Upon his return to England, he authorized the inclusion of Bishop Guerry on the Cathedral's roll of Anglican martyrs, and scheduled a special service of remembrance at Canterbury Cathedral in June 2018 on the 90th anniversary of his death. 

Dean Wright said he hoped all those who draw inspiration from Bishop Guerry's life and example will accept Dean Willis' invitation to the special celebration two years from now.  Dean Willis has also offered to have a candlelight service and other special activities for visitors from South Carolina that week.

Guerry was murdered in his office in what is now the parish house at St. Philip's Episcopal Church in Charleston.  He is buried in the parish cemetery.  

St. Philip's is currently suing the Church and its South Carolina diocese, claiming in court that it was never part of the Episcopal Church.

It was more than a small irony last week when the Diocese Bishop Guerry once led hosted a tumultuous three-day celebration welcoming the Most Rev. Michael Bruce Curry to South Carolina.  Curry is the first African American to serve as Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church.


April 15, 2016
California Court:  Breakaways Lose Everything
San Joaquin case raises the same issues as South Carolina lawsuit

Breakaways in San Joaquin were dealt yet another blow as a California appeals court upheld a lower court ruling declaring that 28 parishes, financial assets, and a camp and conference center owned by the Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin... belong to the Episcopal Church.

The issues in the case are nearly identical to the ones raised by ex-Bishop Mark Lawrence in South Carolina in which he and his followers claim to own diocesan property and financial assets with an estimated value of more than $500 million.

A lower court found that the claims of the breakaways in Lawrence's home diocese amounted to little more than thievery.

Last summer the Episcopal Church offered to settle Lawrence's lawsuit by withdrawing any claim to the breakaways' parish properties and financial assets.  In exchange, the parishes would have given up their claims to the diocesan corporation.  The two groups would have shared ownership of the Diocese's camp and conference center.  The parishes also would not have been held liable of the millions of dollars in Episcopal Church funds that Lawrence has misspent over the past three years.

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori signed off on the deal.  Astonishingly, none of the parishes took her up on it. 

Lawrence's lawsuit is currently pending before the South Carolina Supreme Court.

Here's the opinion

Here's the story from Episcopal News Service


April 15, 2016
Newest Episode in GAFFE-CON Melodrama Features  Lawrencians' Pastoral Overseer in Lead Role
Kenyan Primate accuses Bishop of Nairobi of bullying, Anglican Communion of corruption, and unknown bad guy of forging his name and hacking his website


The antics of the American Presidential campaign have been minor league stunts compared to the recent intrigues of the four most prominent anti-gay Primates in Africa.  This week's brouhaha is over the current meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) in Zambia and how a delegation from one of their provinces ended up attending. 

Since January, these leaders of the ultraconservative provinces of Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, and Rwanda have been stewing over their spectacular failure to convince the most recent Primates' Meeting to kick the Episcopal Church out of the Anglican Communion. 

They've also been stung by criticism for then stalking out of the meeting and abandoning their protégé - the leader of the so-called “Anglican Church of North America” - without even asking for a vote on whether he and his renegade organization had a future in Anglicanism.

The row was significant in that the Primates' Meeting and the ACC are two of the four interdependent Instruments of Anglican Unity that govern the 85-million-member Communion.  The Archbishop of Canterbury and the every-tenth-year Lambeth Conference of bishops are the other two.

Anti-gay primates take aim at ACC Conference in Zambia

The dust had barely settled in February when we and other websites reported that the chairman of the ACC was telling colleagues that delegates from the Episcopal Church had the “right and responsibility” to participate in the organization's meeting in Zambia which actually convened this past week.   

The four African primates were officially steamed.  The Rt. Rev. James Tengatenga, their colleague and former Bishop of Southern Malawi, was practically rolling out a red carpet for the gay-loving Episcopalians. 

As expected, they announced they would boycott the ACC meeting but, in a surprise to everyone, the three-person delegation from Kenya was mysteriously present when the roll was called on its opening day.

Meanwhile, back in Nairobi...

No one appeared to be more surprised than The Most Rev. Eliud Wabukala, the leader of the Anglican Church of Kenya, who went ballistic on hearing the news that his three ACC representatives had "defied my authority" and were actually representing him at the ACC meeting. 

Wabukala wasted little time publicly accusing (a) the Rt. Reverend Joel Waweru, Bishop of Nairobi, of bullying the other two delegates into going, (b) the Anglican Communion staff of "corruption" in providing them tickets and accommodations, and (c) an unknown ally of Waweru of forging his name on a fake letter then hacking into his website and posting it.


Add to this volatile mix the reporting of one most irresponsible journalists in the Anglican Communion and you have, well, yet another episode in the long-running melodrama known as GAFFE-CON. 

Facts begin to emerge, but not many answers follow

As nearly as we can determine, the Kenyan delegates received their airline tickets and hotel reservations from the "corrupt" Anglican Communion staff in London long before Wabakala began making noises about not going.  This appears to be a common practice with the ACC, and was not a specific intervention on behalf of the Kenyan delegates.

A few days before the April 8th opening session, Wabukala reportedly told his three ACC representatives that he was not going to the meeting and neither were they. This communication apparently took place over a static-filled cell phone that left everyone on the call hearing what they wanted to hear. 

However, within 24 hours of that conversation, a letter mysteriously appeared on Wabukala's website, saying that he had changed his mind about the three attending the ACC gathering.  The organization had important work to do and Kenya, he felt, should be a part of it.  The letter appeared to bear Wabukala's signature. 

When Wabukala discovered the letter, he denounced it as a forgery, and immediately ordered his staff to take it down.  He claimed that he neither wrote nor posted it.  After a cursory investigation, he determined that the signature was created by a rubberstamp in his office that was sometimes used to affix his signature to letters when he was unavailable. 

However, the question of who wrote the letter, stamped it, and then hacked into the website to post it remained a mystery.

Wabukala was furious and lashed out at what he imagined was a broad conspiracy among his detractors to embarrass him. The rightwing blogosphere happily fanned the flames and eventually word got back to London.

Anglican Communion leader fires back
 
African Archbishop Josiah Idowu-Fearon, General Secretary of the Anglican Communion, was incensed by Wabukala's accusations and issued his own public response:

There have been “suggestions of criminal action including forgery and corruption in which the Archbishop of Canterbury and Anglican Communion Office staff have been mentioned.

“It is the practice of the ACO to book the flights and cover the costs for all delegates attending ACC meetings, though some choose to cover their own costs. To imply that on this occasion this established practice is corrupt is disingenuous. Tickets were arranged well before any indications of non-attendance by a small number of Provinces.

“The unsubstantiated public allegations of forgery against the members of the Kenyan delegation are scurrilous and untrue and are made in a manner against all biblical principles of appropriate behaviour.”
 

Read Idowu-Fearon's full response here

Theories of the crime

There are two theories of what happened that seem to be gaining some credibility. 

The first is that Archbishop Wabukala is right that Waweru manipulated the whole business to go to a gathering he knew Wabukala did not want him and his two colleagues to attend.  Wabukala said that, because the cell-phone conversation he had with the ACC delegates repeatedly broke up, he did not understand everything that was being said or what others on the call thought he was agreeing to.

According to this theory, Bishop Waweru then wrote the controversial letter giving himself and the others permission to go the ACC meeting, bullied the other two delegates into agreeing to go, then high-tailed it to Zambia before the Archbishop could discover the treachery.

The challenge with this theory is it would have required an extraordinary level of sophistication and insider assistance to pull off. 

It also doesn't make a lot of sense.

Waweru certainly would have to have been a very effective bully to convince the two other ACC delegates that they somehow heard Wabukala give them permission to attend the meeting when he didn't.  He also somehow had to recruit confederates in Wabukala's employ to cook up a fake letter and get it onto the Province's official website without being detected. 


The letter would have made no difference in whether they could go.  The delegates already had their paid-for tickets and hotel accommodations, so there was nothing forcing them to stay in Kenya.  Surely they would have known that the Archbishop would discover the letter, so the idea that Waweru or someone else in the delegation went to all this trouble needlessly, seems far-fetched at best.

The conspirators would also have had to know Wabukala's password to his computer, and then to his website... to say nothing of locating the rubberstamp and getting a confederate into his office to post the letter when no one was around. 

An alternate theory is that that Wabukala and his allies may have staged the entire business to embarrass Waweru.  Wabukala is retiring this year and Waweru is a strong contender in next month's election to succeed him. 

According to Wabukala, the Nairobi bishop has not been overly supportive of his anti-Episcopal Church stance and his years of boycotting of Anglican Communion activities.  In the past few days, Wabukala has happily reminding bloggers and reporters that Waweru has defied his authority on other occasions as well and "wonders" if he will pay a price for his
disobedience and disloyalty when the election is held.

And this has something to do with South Carolina why?

At this point you may be asking why SC Episcopalians would even be interested in this silliness. 

Well, the main reason is that these four primates - Wabukala in particular - are the spiritual leaders of what is left if the breakaway “diocese” led by ex-Bishop Mark Lawrence.

Yes, you read that correctly.  Two years ago the Lawrence's leadership team steered its flock into an ill-advised relationship of “pastoral oversight” with a group calling itself GAFCON.  The GAFCON is an unauthorized affiliation of dissident conservative primates who have sought to rid their counties and the Anglican Communion of gays and lesbians, and anyone else who thinks they are okay.

Wabukala is actually the Chairman of GAFCON so, in essence, he is the highest spiritual authority for the followers of Mark Lawrence.  We know, hard to believe.

These four primates are the backbone of the GAFCON leadership. They are the same ones who made fools of themselves at the Primates’ meeting in January, and now again, by refusing to attend this week’s meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council because they might have to talk to Episcopalians. 

Their antics have pretty much cost them any relevant role in the Communion.  Their ongoing battle of over homosexuality appears to have become a sideshow, especially with the rising star of Michael Bruce Curry, the new Presiding Bishop and Primate of the Episcopal Church.

However, the damage the GAFCON primates have done to the Communion is nothing compared to the havoc they have reeked on their respective countries through dark alliances with autocratic leaders, who have rewarded them with political influence, monetary gifts, and – as in the case of Uganda – luxury automobiles. 

Among the dubious fruit of those relationships has been the passage of criminal laws that have resulted in the harassment, torture, and incarceration of gays and lesbians.  In some instances, thanks to support from these African Christian leaders – and even Christians in the United States – homosexuality became punishable by death.

The question is: How long will the followers of Mark Lawrence’s “diocese” put up with this perversion of God’s call to love mercy and do justice and get themselves back on track?


April 10, 2016
Grace Church in Charleston Recognized as Anglican Communion's Newest Cathedral
Dean of Canterbury Cathedral affirms historic ties to the Diocese with an ancient stone from Anglicanism's  "Mother Cathedral"

Amid the pomp and pageantry at Grace Church Cathedral this morning, a visitor at first might not have noticed the distinguished priest with the shock of white hair and very distinct British accent. 

However, as the service moved forward, The Very Reverend Robert Willis quickly won the hearts of his American cousins as he spoke movingly of the importance of the Episcopal Church and The Episcopal Church in South Carolina in the "Anglican family."

Willis was at Grace to join Presiding Bishop Michael Bruce Curry in celebrating the life of the "newest Cathedral in the Anglican Communion" and commemorating those ties with the gift of an ancient stone from historic Canterbury Cathedral, which he leads.  According to Dean Willis, the Cathedral at Canterbury presents each cathedral in the Communion with such a stone that includes the imprint of a Canterbury cross as a sign of their solidarity.

Willis also announced that he and his staff were eagerly looking forward to a visit of South Carolina "pilgrims" to Canterbury later this year.  More details on that to come.

Read more on Presiding Bishop Curry's historic visit to the Diocese and see photographs of each event on the website of The Episcopal Church in South Carolina.


April 10, 2016
Joyous Visit by Presiding Bishop Draws Thousands 
Michael Curry's three-day stay in the Diocese bolsters spirits, and pride in the Episcopal Church


CHARLESTON - At the end of his three-day visit to Charleston this afternoon, Presiding Bishop Michael Curry clearly had not had enough of South Carolina.  He was craving barbeque. 

Curry was running late for his midafternoon flight and having trouble walking away from the crowds that surrounded him after the 11 a.m. service at Grace Church Cathedral.  However, his host, South Carolina Bishop Charles vonRosenberg, somehow managed to marshal his forces and locate a good take-out restaurant on the way to the airport. 

The image of the former Tennessee Bishop looking for South Carolina barbeque for the former Bishop of North Carolina seemed a perfect symbol of the growing affection between the people of this Diocese and their new leader.

Curry's visit was drenched in both symbolism and purpose.  He deliberately sought out a number of historically black congregations to commemorate their significance in the evolution of the Episcopal Church, while seeking other venues to inspire fellow Episcopalians with his vision of evangelism and justice. 

In less than 48 hours, Curry had managed to visit St. Stephen's, Calvary, St. Mark's, Holy Communion, and Grace Church Cathedral, while squeezing in special encounters with the youth of the Diocese and members of the public. 

An all-day conference Saturday at the Church of the Holy Communion included representatives from parishes throughout both South Carolina dioceses, including Bishop Andrew Waldo.  At that conference, Curry urged participants to "imagine every Episcopalian, every Anglican, committed to living out the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth and living in his spirit."  

During his trip, the presiding bishop made few, if any, specific references to the bitter attempt by followers of ex-Bishop Mark Lawrence to leave the Church, but his language was clearly inclusive of any that may choose to return to the Episcopal fold after the courts resolve their lawsuit against the Church and its diocese in eastern South Carolina.

Curry's final appearance was at Grace this morning where he joined the congregation in the receiving of an historic carved stone from the Dean of Canterbury Cathedral to commemorate its becoming the newest cathedral in the Anglican Communion "family." 

In spite of the lengthy service, members of the congregation simply moved outside when it was over and continued to embrace the presiding bishop.  He eagerly greeted the crowd that included Charleston's new Mayor John Tecklenberg and his wife, signed autographs, and happily posed for hundreds of photographs and "selfies". 


April 8, 2016
Presiding Bishop Curry's Historic Visit to Charleston Starts with Extraordinary Ecumenical Prayer Service
Mother Emanuel's new pastor lights up St. Stephen's crowd amid joyous music affirming role of African Americans in the Episcopal Church

From the first words of "In Christ, there is no east or west," Presiding Bishop Michael Curry did not stop smiling. 

The new leader of the Episcopal Church could not have been more obviously delighted by his welcome to Charleston tonight, as St. Stephen's in Ansonborough welcomed the leader of the Episcopal Church with an extraordinary choral service of evening prayer reflecting the city's heritage of blues and spirituals, along with a powerful appeal for Christian unity by the new pastor of Emanuel AME.

The service also provided members of the downtown church community an opportunity to acknowledge a traumatic year of pain and grief over the violent deaths of nine members of an Emanuel AME Bible study.  Many of those who guided the community through that time were present and participated in the service.

Curry's three-day visit, featuring events at five Episcopal parishes on the peninsula, will culminate in a festival Eucharist at Grace Church Cathedral on Sunday morning.  He is visiting The Episcopal Church in South Carolina at the invitation of its bishop and his friend, Charles vonRosenberg.

The Rev. Dr. Betty Deas Clark, the Charleston native who succeeded the late Clementa Pinckney as senior pastor at Mother Emanuel, wasted little time reminding the congregation that, in spite of the diversity of our religious expression, God calls the Church to be one people, "so that others will then know us by our love."  Many in the pews had been affected by last summer's shooting rampage just down the street and were deeply moved by her hopeful and welcoming message.

One of the biggest surprises was the extensive musical program presented by the St. Stephen's choir and its exceptionally talented director, Wayne Helmly.  Curry was clearly affected by the music and one point looked up into the choir loft and asked who had planned it.  Helmly was wildly applauded as he acknowledged Curry and waved a dog-eared copy of the Presiding Bishop's book, "Songs My Grandmother Sang."  

In that book Curry said “I learned what I believed in the songs I heard my family, especially my grandmother, sing. We sang our faith every day.” 

Helmly and members of the choir had studied the book in planning the service.  The Presiding Bishop again showed his enthusiasm for the music when he startled choir members by climbing up into the choir loft at the end of the service to thank them personally.

Members of the congregation, some of whom had never visited an Episcopal Church, were pleased at what they experienced.  One member of a local Missionary Baptist congregation said, "I told my preacher he'd better watch out Sunday 'cause tonight I was getting ole big dose of Anglicanism."

Curry heads to The Church of the Holy Communion tomorrow for a full day of sharing his vision of evangelism and "The Jesus Movement."  Later tomorrow evening he will visit Calvary Episcopal Church.

Sunday's 11 a.m. at the Cathedral will be live-streamed through the Diocesan website.


April 5, 2016
Presiding Bishop's Visit to be Rich in Symbolism and Substance
Curry's arrival on Friday will be his first visit since becoming Presiding Bishop


The Episcopal Church in South Carolina is bracing for a three-day whirlwind visit from the Most Reverend Michael Bruce Curry, the Presiding Bishop and Primate of The Episcopal Church.  The visit this weekend will be limited to venues in the Charleston area, but include multiple opportunities for loyal Episcopalians in the Diocese to see and hear their new leader, including online Sunday morning at Charleston's Grace Church Cathedral.

The visit will be drenched in both substance and symbolism as the Diocese seeks to use Curry's visit as an affirmation of its heritage among African Americans, as well as among the 38 provinces of the Anglican Communion.  His visit will include an evensong at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church with the Rev. Dr. Betty Deas Clark, the Senior Pastor of Emmanuel AME Church, and events at historically black congregations at Calvary and St. Mark's.   Later that evening he will visit with young people of the Diocese at the Cathedral.

Curry's major public appearance in Charleston will be on Saturday at The Church of the Holy Communion, when he gives the keynote address at an all-day educational conference titled "Spirituality, Evangelism, and Justice: Telling the Story, Sharing the Message of The Jesus Movement."  Sign up to attend
 
In 2015, Presiding Bishop Curry was elected by an overwhelming margin to a nine-year term as the 27th Presiding Bishop, becoming the first African American to serve in that position. He often refers to the church as "The Jesus Movement" and is known for his dynamic speaking style and passion for evangelism. He is also a Primate in the worldwide Anglican Communion, of which The Episcopal Church is a province, and in January represented the church at a meeting of the Anglican Primates with the Archbishop of Canterbury.
 
The Presiding Bishop – who at that time was Bishop of North Carolina and already a nationally known speaker and author – has been strongly supportive of the diocese and preached at the Diocesan Convention in February 2014. 
 
At 11:00 a.m. Sunday, April 10, Presiding Bishop Curry will give the sermon at Grace Church Cathedral, the newly-designated cathedral of the diocese. The Very Reverend Robert Willis, Dean of Canterbury Cathedral in the Church of England, is also visiting Grace for the festive Choral Eucharist, which will be webcast live at gracechurchcharleston.org.

More information ...


March 16, 2016
Lawrence Crowd Pumps Up Fake Diocese's Numbers by Laying Claim to Loyal Episcopal Clergy, Parishes, and Missions
Breakaways' Convention Journals say Archdeacon Walpole is one of more than a dozen loyal Episcopal priests "canonically resident" with them, while 22 loyalist congregations, including Grace Church Cathedral, are "in union" with their annual convention

Only days after being busted for assuring his followers that the renegade "Anglican Church of North America" is part of the Anglican Communion, ex-Bishop Lawrence and his lieutenants now have more explaining to do after releasing the Journal of his 2015 "diocesan" Convention that lists nearly a dozen leaders of the continuing (real) Episcopal Diocese as "canonically resident" in his breakaway "diocese."

The Journal also lists 22 loyal parishes and missions of the legitimate Episcopal Diocese, including its Cathedral, as "in union" with the fake "diocese"... but for some reason they haven't been registering their delegates to annual conventions over the past few years. 

The Episcopal Church is subdivided into dioceses, which are led by bishops. All of its active clergy must be "canonically resident" in one of those dioceses.  Parishes in the United States must be "in union" with a diocese (its Annual Convention technically) to be part of the Episcopal Church and the worldwide Anglican Communion. 

Among those loyal Episcopal clergy listed as "canonically resident" in the 
Journal of the breakaways' "224th Annual Convention" are The Rev. Donald McPhail, the retired long-time rector of Grace, Charleston; The Rev. Jim Taylor, Diocesan Treasurer and rector of St. Thomas, North Charleston; The Venerable Calhoun Walpole, Archdeacon of the continuing Diocese; The Rev. Wilmot Merchant, immediate past President of the Diocesan Standing Committee; and The Rev. Dow Sanderson, current chair of the Diocesan Commission on Ministry and rector of Holy Communion, Charleston.

Lawrence and 36 parishes supporting him have filed suit against the Episcopal Church, claiming they are free to leave and take millions of dollars in property and financial assets with them.  The group calls itself "The Diocese of South Carolina" and Lawrence insists that he is still an Episcopal bishop of an Episcopal diocese that just doesn't happen to belong to the Episcopal Church.

Fake "Diocese" does well... except when facts get in the way

Lawrence and his lieutenants have spent much of the past three years trying to prop up their failing venture with all kinds of misleading claims, including exactly how many people belong to their "diocese". 

Generally they say that they are booming with 23,000 members. 

It's a puzzling claim in that their own reports show they've been losing membership and financial support ever since Lawrence became bishop in 2008.  Those losses have accelerated annually since he quit the Church in 2012 (see links in the posting below). 

Today Sunday attendance in breakaway parishes average less than 10,000.  When Lawrence became bishop, the diocese had more than 30,000 baptized members.

Legal case in limbo

Nearly three years ago, the Rt. Rev. Charles vonRosenberg, who leads the continuing (real) Episcopal Church in eastern South Carolina, asked the Federal District Court in Charleston to issue an injunction against Lawrence to prevent him from masquerading as an "Episcopal bishop." 

While the wily ex-bishop quit the Episcopal Church more than three years ago, he continues to occupy the Church's Diocesan House, and elegant Bishop's Residence (at a reported rent of $1 a year.)  Lawrence often attends ultraconservative conferences as a "bishop" on other continents, even though he is not recognized as one by any legitimate Church. Diocesan records show he spent $47,424 on travel in 2013, and $41,178 in 2014. 

VonRosenberg's case against Lawrence has proven to be an embarrassment for the Federal Court in that the very elderly retired judge who was assigned the case has consistently refused to hear it.  It is still pending. 


March 14, 2016
Breakaways Back Off Claim ACNA is in the Anglican Communion
Breakaway movement in North America is farther from real Anglicanism than it has ever been


In a rare moment of clarity over fiction today, ex-Bishop Lawrence's "diocese" seemed to back away from its claim that the so-called "Anglican Church of North America" is part of the Anglican Communion.  The assertion was made on its website Saturday night in an official report from the breakaway group's Annual Convention.

"ACNA is part of the worldwide Anglican Communion, whose membership now exceeds 85 million worshipers in more than 165 countries," the website said.  The Lawrence crowd did not allow news media - like SC Episcopalians - to attend the Convention but we have been informed that the claim was made to the delegates during their consideration of plans for future affiliation.

After the story broke on this website, it was picked up by other online news services.
  Magically, the bogus claim disappeared from the breakaways' website Monday morning.


The claim is important to Lawrence and his lieutenants in that they promised their followers in 2012 that they would still be part of the Communion if they left the Episcopal Church.  For three years they have done somersaults trying to make good on their promise.  

In fact, the Episcopal Church is the only Anglican Province recognized by the Communion in the United States. To be Anglican and be an American, one must be an Episcopalian.  The Communion recognizes only Andrew Waldo and Charles vonRosenberg as its bishops in South Carolina. 

The ACNA, founded by anti-gay, anti-women Episcopal Church dissidents, has recently been rejected as a member of the Communion, in one way or another, by all Four Instruments of Anglican Unity.


March 12, 2016
Breakaway “Diocese” Looking to ACNA as its New Home
As discernment begins, Lawrence continues to mislead followers about membership in the Anglican Communion

This morning delegates to the Annual Convention of the breakaway “Diocese of South Carolina” initiated a process of discernment over a move to the so-called “Anglican Church of North America,” after a special task force on affiliation recommended it as a path forward.  The “diocese”, which is led by ex-bishop Mark Lawrence, has been without an ecclesial home for over three years after its members claim they joined him in exiting the Episcopal Church and with their parish properties with them.

The move to ACNA, which would require the agreement of two subsequent conventions, is badly needed as uncertainty over the "diocese's" identity may be contributing to a staggering loss of revenue and membership

Nearly every year since the controversial Lawrence took the helm in 2008, income and attendance have declined.  After declaring war on the Church in 2012, those losses accelerated.  Today less than 10,000 people are in the pews of its parishes on Sundays.

Ironically, if the deal goes through, the ACNA bishop under whom they will be placed is Steve Wood, a former Episcopal priest who was defeated in 2006 when he was nominated for Bishop against Lawrence. Wood joined ACNA shortly after that and became a bishop after famously calling the Presiding Bishop "the anti-Christ" and the Episcopal Church a "whore" (but used much more colorful language we can't repeat here). He has since questioned the accuracy of that allegation.

Of course, consideration of any move other than back to the Episcopal Church may be meaningless, if the South Carolina Supreme Court fails to uphold a decision by a lower court that the breakaway “diocese” can leave the Church with its parish property and financial assets.  That case is currently pending before the Court.

ACNA:  We are Anglican, even if the Communion says we are not
 
As usual, Lawrence and his lieutenants tried to confuse the delegates today by misrepresenting the nature of ACNA.  They say it is part of the Anglican Communion, even though it is not recognized by any of the four Instruments of Anglican Unity that govern the Communion (see story below). 

The Communion lists recognized bishops online and it includes only Andrew Waldo and Charles vonRosenberg as those in South Carolina.  Foley Beach, the head of the ACNA is not listed, nor is Mr. Wood or Mark Lawrence.

In fact, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has made it very clear that ACNA “is a separate Church (that is) not part of the Communion.”

Among the challenges facing the breakaway "diocese" is that ACNA is not really a traditional "Church" as much as it is a very loose affiliation, mostly of denominations like the Reformed Episcopal Church, that are well established and have their own diocesan structures, bishops, and definitions of what it means to be Anglican”. 

A number of independent congregations and networks also have drifted into ACNA’s orbit, but they don’t appear to share a common theology or lines of authority.  They generally seem to be anti-gay and anti-women, and insistent that their way of understanding the Bible is the only way.

SC Episcopalians
did a quick review of a number of ACNA parish websites and found that many make no reference to ACNA membership and are governed by bishops and other leaders who were not consecrated by ACNA nor accountable to its hierarchy.  There also does not seem to be a set of shared standards for ordination, seminary education, or the role of women. 

It will be a big adjustment for the "Diocese of South Carolina," if it cannot elect its own bishops. The election and assignment of bishops in ACNA is done in secret.  Of course, Lawrence runs his “diocese” in secret, so it might not be much of an adjustment.

ACNA Leader:  I was treated like a Primate, so I must be one

The ACNA is headed up by a man named Foley Beach, who was consecrated as its Archbishop two years ago by a handful of rebellious Anglican Primates (provincial leaders) mostly from Africa. They had no authority to do that, and actually violated any number of agreements under which the Communion is governed.

These same Primates forced Archbishop Welby to invite Beach to the recent Primates Meeting in London as a price for their attending.  After the meeting, Beach was asked if he was disappointed that he was not recognized as a Primate himself, and said: 

“I am already recognized as a fellow Primate as declared at my investiture by the Primates of GAFCON and the Global South. The Archbishop of Canterbury treated me with the respect of a Primate throughout the whole meeting… I was treated as a Primate by my fellow Primates,”

That the breakaways in South Carolina would fall yet another hoax by a renegade bishop is shameful.
 
First off, GAFCON is a handful of narrow-minded Primates who have repeatedly threatened to leave the Communion if they don’t get their way.  They only serve as a distraction to the Communion and its worldwide ministry.  When GAFCON is present, nothing gets done.

Second, GAFCON is not even recognized by the Communion as having authority to do anything.  In the eyes of real Anglicans, it does not exist.  Consequently Beach’s suggestion that ACNA’s relationship with GAFCON makes it part of the Communion -- or makes him a Primate -- is ridiculous. 
 
Finally, the Archbishop of Canterbury is a very nice man who treats everyone he meets with respect.  However, this does not mean that everyone he meets is instantly one of the 38 Primates of the Communion.  There are actually real processes in place that make someone an Anglican Primate.  Being "treated" like one - whatever that means -- is not among them.

Beach should try treating the Archbishop with the same respect he claims to have been given and stop misleading people about his relationship to the Anglican Communion.


March 11, 2016
Breakaways' Convention Dodging Unpleasant Realities
This weekend's annual gathering ignores financial and legal challenges

BLUFFTON - The odds are significant that this weekend’s Annual Convention of ex-Bishop Lawrence’s “Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina” will be its last. 

As delegates gather in Bluffton today, they appear to be unaware of the seriousness of the challenges they are facing over the next few months. The published agenda includes no plans to address events since last year’s convention that have effectively stripped them of their Anglican identity and cast them even farther adrift.  

Convention planners also seem to be avoiding painful conversations on the financial liabilities their “diocese” and its parishes will face should they lose their three-year-old lawsuit against the Episcopal Church and its continuing South Carolina diocese. Given the disastrous reception Lawrence’s legal team encountered at the state Supreme Court last September, it seems like a huge mistake not to be talking about what this could mean for them.

 
Adrift

The question of identity is important to any Church, but especially for the Lawrencians, whose uncertain odyssey since 2012 has been grounded in a shared fear of gays and lesbians, women in positions of ecclesiastic authority, and those whose experience of the Bible is different from their own. 

But fear is not a recipe for growth.

These congregations are not growing and not likely to as they continue to embrace a theology more in common with centuries other than the present one.  Their lack of affiliation with a larger ecclesiastical body has led to a loss of accountability, tradition, and connectedness. They don't even have a procedure in place for electing and confirming a successor to Lawrence, or even an idea which denomination he should come from.

Participation has suffered as well.  Pro-Lawrence parishes cumulatively average less than 10,000 people in the pews each Sunday while resources for ministry, at both the “diocesan” and parish levels, have withered under the strain of sustaining a 40-plus member legal team, going on four years.  

Read Dr. Ron Caldwell's report on the loss of members in the breakaway congregations

Nearly one-third of these parishes have not been able to meet their financial obligations to the “diocese” on a timely basis (though a number of them have caught up this last year).  Instead of attracting new clergy, the Lawrence “diocese” has taken to circulating its rectors from one parish to another as outstanding, more experienced clergy see the likelihood of the Lawrence regime going down in flames like their allies in neighboring Georgia and Virginia. 

It's a sign of the times that leading Lawrencian parishes have discreetly begun advertising themselves as “Episcopal”, especially online where transplanted Episcopalians might go to look for a new parish. 

Trinity, Edisto continues to promote itself as an Episcopal Church, even to the point of using the official seal of the Episcopal Church.  The Lawrencian chaplain at The Citadel promotes himself to new students and their parents as “Episcopal,” while neglecting to tell them that he actually abandoned his ministry in the Episcopal Church over three years ago and is only recognized as a priest by Lawrence’s breakaway group.

Lawrence himself is known to be disappointed in the direction his rebellion in South Carolina has taken, and appears to be less engaged in shaping the future of parishes that have followed him into a murky, uncharted waters. Intimates say that he is longing to return to California, but is also aware that he may have personal legal liabilities of his own to deal with in South Carolina if his lawsuit goes down.

Not “Anglican”

Central to the breakaways’ identity is Lawrence’s insistence that his followers are somehow “Anglican,” even though they have severed ties with the only formally-recognized province of the Anglican Communion in the United States.  

He and his lieutenants have persisted in this claim even though the Archbishop of Canterbury made it clear in the fall of 2014 that the breakaway movement in the United States is “a separate church… not part of the Communion.”

GAFFE-CON

Lawrence and his lieutenants insist that they are part of the Communion because they have entered into a cockamamie “oversight” scheme they cooked up a couple of years ago with a handful of anti-gay Anglican primates, who have formed an alliance known as GAFCON. They claim that recognition by GAFCON means they are “Anglican” by association. 

However, GAFCON itself is not recognized by the Communion, much less does it have any authority to recognize any other groups as “Anglican.”
  
The absurdity of this scam became apparent last summer when Lawrence invited the leader of the GAFCON to visit the “diocese” and assure his followers that they are part of the Communion. 

Archbishop Hector “Tito” Zavalas, the hapless primate of the tiny Anglican Province of South America, personally assured the Lawrence faithful and SC Episcopalians that the Archbishop of Canterbury fully supported the efforts of GAFCON and its oversight agreement with the Lawrence “diocese.”

Unfortunately, blogger and historian Ron Caldwell smelled a rat and actually contacted Welby’s people at Lambeth Palace about Zavalas’ claim. 

They were not amused.  With typical British restraint, they told Caldwell that there is no way the Archbishop would give his blessing to such an arrangement. 

The rat he smelled was indeed... a rat.

Primates affirm Episcopal Church in spite of wrist-slap
 
The Zavalas fiasco was a minor embarrassment compared to the Primates meeting in January.  That was when the GAFCON primates had decided to launch a scheme to expel the Episcopal Church from the Anglican Communion and replace it with Lawrence's breakaway cousin, the so-called "Anglican Church of North America (ACNA)".

But the scheme unraveled and the GAFCON primates gradually hightailed it out of London before the meeting was over, leaving pro-Episcopal Church primates to write the final summary of their week of work together. 

While the remaining primates administered the Episcopalians a slap on the wrist for its endorsement of same-gender marriage, their language reaffirmed the importance of the Episcopal Church to the Communion and the growing influence of its new Presiding Bishop.

At the end of the Primates’ Meeting, a frustrated Archbishop of Canterbury was asked if the American breakaways would be invited to his 2020 Lambeth Conference, which all the primates had agreed to attend. 

He replied sharply, "I don't know".  

Episcopal Church has the "right and responsibility" to participate

So by the end of January the breakaway movement in North America had doors slammed in its face by three of Anglicanism’ four Instruments of Unity that together lead the Communion – the Archbishop of Canterbury, The Primates’ Meeting, and the Lambeth Conference.

All that remained to be heard from was the fourth Instrument, the Anglican Consultative Council.

That happen just last month when its Presiding Officer, the Rt. Rev. James Tengatenga, the former Anglican Bishop of Southern Malawi, was quoted as saying that the delegates from the Episcopal Church to the ACC’s upcoming meeting in Africa in April would have the “right and responsibility” to vote and participate fully in the deliberations of the Council. 

Tengatenga's comments were a firm rejection of the Primates wrist-slap in which they insisted that the Episcopal representatives be restrained from such involvement for the next three years. 

Legal reversals since last year's convention have changed everything

Reversals in the Anglican Communion paled in comparison to setbacks in the Lawrencians' legal struggle to leave the Episcopal Church with Church property and financial assets valued in excess of $500,000,000.  

Last September the state’s Supreme Court heard the Church’s appeal of a lower court decision favorable to the breakaway “diocese."  The lower court victory had been so favorable that Lawrencian attorneys were excessively confident of a rubberstamp in the high court. 

However, they were greeted almost immediately by outraged justices who could not make sense of the lower court ruling (written mostly by Lawrence’s attorneys) and the circus-like atmosphere in its trial in the courtroom of Dorchester County Circuit Judge Diane Goodstein.

The Chief Justice, on whom the Lawrencians were counting to champion their cause, instead bashed them for misrepresenting her carefully constructed 2009 opinion in the case of All Saints’, Waccamaw.  The breakaways’ entire legal case was based on All Saints’, and their legal team became white-faced when the Chief Justice declared, “All Saints has nothing to do with this case.”

They were also taken aback by a very aggressive assault on their case by Horry County attorney Blake Hewitt, who had not been a part of the Church's legal team until this point.  Hewitt savaged the Lawrencian's case to the point that none of the justices seemed to be either willing or able to argue against him. 

Beaufort attorney Alan Runyon, the chief architect of Lawrence's legal strategy, scrambled to counter Hewitt's blistering presentation, but his arguments fell apart in the face of repeated skepticism from the Court and occasional sniping between him and justices who seemed hostile.

The opinion has not yet been handed down.

Unexpected settlement offer

The Supreme Court hearing had a particularly devastating effect on the 36 parishes that had joined Lawrence’s lawsuit.  Most of them were stampeded into signing on as plaintiffs I 2012 even though there was no advantage to them in doing so.

About three months prior to the Court hearing, many of them were realizing that they were on a sinking ship.  In June, when the Church’s lawyers proposed a settlement offer, approved by the Presiding Bishop herself, more objective parish leaders correctly saw it as a life preserver.

Indeed it was.  The Episcopal Church was willing to give up all its claims on the property of pro-Lawrence parishes in exchange for their giving up their claims on its Diocese.  Particularly appealing was that the Church was willing to release these parishes from having to pay legal costs and financial reimbursements that they would have to pay if they lost the case.

Lawrence's attorneys panicked as they realized that the offer was legitimate.  Without even consulting the affected parishes, they rejected the proposal and created a widening trust gap between Lawrence and his parishes.

The parishes realized just how fateful that rejection of the settlement offer was when they realized that Lawrence's case at the Supreme Court was in very serious trouble.  They had naively joined his lawsuit and foolishly put the ownership of their property in the hands of a legal system that now seemed poised to take it from them. 

They also began to understand Lawrence's hysterical warnings that the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church wanted to take over their parishes and fill them with gays, lesbians, and transgendered people, was hooey, and merely a masterful manipulation to get them to join (and pay for) his legal adventures. 

Under pressure from Lawrence's lieutenants, their clergy had left the Episcopal ministry, making them ineligible to continue to serve their congregations, should the Church regain ownership of their parishes.  Even worse they could be on the hook financially for millions in court costs and restoration of four years of misspent funds that rightfully belonged to the Episcopal Church.

Other than that, it looks like the convention delegates are in for a worry-free weekend.



March 10, 2016


Episcopal Church has "Right and Responsibility" to Participate in Upcoming Anglican Consultative Council Meeting

North American breakaways four of four in rejection by Anglican Instruments of Unity

The Chairman of the Anglican Consultative Council – the entity from which January’s Primates Meeting said Episcopalians should be banned - said this month that delegates from the Episcopal Church have the “right and responsibility” to participate and vote in the upcoming ACC meeting in Zambia.

The Rt. Rev. James Tengatenga, the former Anglican Bishop of Southern Malawi, was quoted by the Anglican Ink news service as saying to the Dean of the School of Theology at Sewanee that January's Primates Meeting did not have the power to dictate to the ACC which of its members could and could not vote. 

The three ACC representatives from the Episcopal Church have all stated publicly that they will attend the meeting in April.

The Rt. Reverend Stanley Ntagali, Archbishop of Uganda, has said he will not attend the ACC meeting.  He described the support of the ACC leadership for the Episcopal Church to be a ‘betrayal’.

The Anglican Communion is constructed on four so-called “Instruments of Unity” with two of the four being the ACC and the Primates’ Meeting.  The others are the Archbishop of Canterbury and the every-ten-year Lambeth Conference of Anglican bishops.


February 15, 2016


Archbishop of Canterbury Delivers Remarkable Address to his General Synod

Upbeat about future of the Anglican Communion, Welby says Primates' Meeting was "spun more than Donald Trump"

On the Episcopal Church:  "You will not find the word ‘sanction’ or ‘punishment’ or anything like it at any point in ... the decision taken

On Consequences: "... no meeting of the Communion has any authority to give instructions to individual provinces."


On ACNA:  "There is no clear process or precedent for a new Province to join, except as an agreed spin-off from a previous Province."

Read and see the entire address here

Read commentary by Dr, Ron Caldwell


February 10, 2016

ACNA Bid for a Seat at the Anglican Table Falters
American breakaways are even farther adrift after Primates' Meeting


After last month’s meeting of Anglican primates, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby was asked by a reporter if the self-styled “Anglican Church in North America” would be invited to his worldwide gathering of bishops at Lambeth Palace in 2020. 

With a hint of irritation, Welby said stoutly he didn’t know

That seemingly minor exchange in ever-so-understated Anglican-speak went largely unreported in the mainstream news media.  However, those with ears to hear them realized that the Archbishop’s words hinted at a disaster-in-progress for breakaway groups "across the Pond” hoping for Anglican legitimacy.

By any measure the biggest loser at last month’s Primate’s Meeting was ACNA and its scheme to backstab its way into Communion membership at the expense of the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Church of Canada.

Buried in the Primates’ final communique was a perfunctory statement that ACNA’s quest to join was not a matter for them to address.  Their suggestion was that it belonged with the western-leaning Anglican Consultative Council.  Even then, the communique added, it's probably not an idea worth pursuing:

“The consideration of the required application for admission to membership of the Communion of the Anglican Church in North America was recognized as properly belonging to the Anglican Consultative Council. The Primates recognize that such an application, were it to come forward, would raise significant questions of polity and jurisdiction.”  

A better and more in-depth analysis of ACNA’s bid for provincial status was developed by historian Dr. Ronald Caldwell and is available by clicking here. 

1. GAFCON and ACNA

Eight years ago ACNA was created through a political alliance of dissident Episcopalians and former members of the Anglican Church of Canada to create an alternative anti-gay “province” that could eventually replace their former provinces as the North American representative in the councils of the Communion. 

They created an infrastructure that mimicked the Communion's provincial infrastructure, including calling their leader an “Archbishop and Primate”.  They persist in advertising themselves publicly as “Anglicans” and "constituent members of the Anglican Communion" even though they were not recognized as such by any official Anglican entity.  


However, the driving force behind ACNA was an ascendant minority of ultraconservative primates from Africa, South America, and Asia, who’d aligned themselves with shadowy groups like the Institute for Religion & Democracy and an array of wealthy donors and right-wing bloggers to fight the growing openness of western provinces to gays and lesbians, women in ecclesiastical authority, and believers whose experience of the Bible was different from their own.

The group, known as GAFCON, developed a significant network of dissident bishops in conservative American dioceses that included Pittsburgh, San Joaquin, Quincy, Fort Worth, and South Carolina.  GAFCON's strategy was to channel resources to ACNA and other allied groups to disrupt the Episcopal and Canadian Churches and discredit their leaders, while creating a consensus within the Communion hierarchy that the two gay-loving provinces had to go. 

2.  In the Primates Meeting, GAFCON saw its chance.

Last September when Welby announced a meeting of the Primates in January 2016, GAFCON saw its long-awaited opportunity to pounce.

The Episcopal Church’s General Convention had recently approved rites for same-gender couples, and it appeared the Canadian Church was well on its way to doing the same thing. 

With antipathy toward the Episcopalians running high, and Welby desperately trying to keep ultraconservative provinces from leaving the Communion, the GAFCON primates felt they at last had a shot at gaining a majority of votes among the primates to oust the Episcopal Church from the Communion and install its North American puppet in its place. 

Upping the ante, GAFCON primates told Welby they would attend the conference to discuss greater Anglican unity, only if he invited the leader of ACNA, Foley Beach.  Welby reluctantly agreed.

3.  ABC's bid for unity & a new Presiding Bishop carry the day

From its first day, the overriding question at the Primates Meeting – and for Welby - was huge:  Were provinces of the historic Anglican Communion committed to staying together as a single worldwide Church or were their divisions so broad that the time had come to “walk separately”? 

Divisions between the provinces in the developing world and those that were older and more established had become so bitter that Welby himself had been promoting the idea of a two-tier Communion, loosely conjoined under a mostly symbolic head.

However, as the meeting got underway and the participants engaged in reflection and dialogue, they seemed to rally behind unity.  They moved beyond talk of division and, in Welby’s words, chose to “walk together” as a single, united Church of Jesus Christ in spite of their vast cultural, theological, and political differences.  

As a symbol of their commitment, Welby later reported that all 38 Primates agreed to attend a new Lambeth Conference he'd convene in 2020.

As the meeting progressed, there was also a new, more positive attitude toward the Episcopal Church emerging among some of the more conservative non-GAFCON primates, whose votes for GAFCON's replacement strategy were critical.  

The Episcopal Church’s new Presiding Bishop and Primate, Michael Curry, was proving to be a big hit with his fellow primates. For many of the participants, this was their first encounter with Curry’s evangelical fervor, joyous disposition, and engaging intellect, and they began to see him as someone with whom they work as opposed to one to be punished.

At least one African participant said afterwards that he had never understood the theology behind the Episcopal Church’s embrace of same-gender unions until Curry explained it. 

However, the GAFCON crowd proved to be politically tone-deaf, and on the second day of the Meeting, Ugandan Primate and GAFCON leader Stanley Ntagali offered a proposal to get the Episcopal Church and Anglican Church of Canada to voluntarily leave the meeting and the Communion. 

With the two provinces out of the picture, a way might be found to bring ACNA in. 

However, Ntagali's proposal was apparently poorly received.  It is not clear if it was voted on or if it just failed to gain any apparent traction.

The next morning (Wednesday) the GAFCON primates made a second run at the Episcopal Church with a less aggressive punishment, and that failed on a reported 15-20 vote.  Finally, by a 30-6 vote, they succeeded in getting their colleagues to impose a relatively minor time-out on the Episcopal Church because it had failed to consult with the Communion before changing, what the primates described as, the Communion's “theology of marriage.”

Welby went to great lengths to tell the news media that the action taken against the Episcopal Church was merely “consequences” of having failed to consult.  He dismissed terms like “sanctions”, “punishment,” and “suspension” that the GAFCON and ACNA crowd were promoting.  There were no conditions attached to the "consequences" that would force the General Convention to backtrack or repeal its previous actions.

Though momentarily chastised, the Episcopal Church emerged from the gathering as a continuing partner in the Communion... and ACNA was done.

4. ACNA's quest for Communion recognition is essentially over  

Ntagali slipped out of town on the evening of the second day to get home for a pre-arranged victory lap in Kampala, while other disappointed GAFCON primates apparently left the meeting over the next 36 hours.  Whatever effort they planned to make on behalf of ACNA never happened, and their absence meant that the final communique, summing up the essential components of the gathering, would be written without them. 

Even Beach didn’t hang around long, vaguely claiming he had some other pressing engagement. 
In spite of ACNA’s frequent news releases about the important role he played at the meeting, it was clear its hopes for Communion membership was toast.   

Since 2014 ACNA has been on a slow train to Anglican purgatory, when Welby told a radio interviewer, in that same irritated tone, that ACNA was a “separate Church,” that is not part of the Anglican Communion. It could possibly be a partner with the Communion at some point, he speculated, but in no way was it part of the Anglican Communion.

ACNA bishops haven't helped themselves over the years by insisting that the Archbishop of Canterbury - one of four Instruments of Anglican Unity -- doesn't really run the Anglican Communion and wasn't the final word on anything. They also did not endear themselves to the Anglican world when they forced the cancellation of the 2018 Lambeth Conference - another of the Instruments of Anglican Unity - by refusing to attend.

Even the American breakaways' most prominent rebel, Mark Lawrence in South Carolina, has said he has doubts about ACNA’s viability.  

At his 2015 “Diocesan” convention, Lawrence told participants that he was troubled by the group’s lack of a coherent governing structure and failure to clearly articulate a single compelling theology beyond its opposition to the Episcopal Church.  At a prior convention, Lawrence had even backed a resolution making the Book of Common Prayer the standard for all parishes aligned with him instead of a new prayer book by ACNA.

The most demoralizing part of the whole business for ACNA’s leaders last month is that their allies among the primates, dumped them and their cause when they no longer had any political value.  Post-Meeting statements issued by GAFCON primates scarcely even mentioned Beach or ACNA.   

5. Beach's Folly

From the get go, Foley Beach's presence at Canterbury was akin to a skunk at a garden party.

He was not a primate, but was being treated as if he was one.  His presence was made possible through a political deal, not through any established process by which he was chosen by a legitimate province based on his ministry or merits.  He was at war with two provinces of the Communion, in ways that several primates were experiencing with rebels in their own provinces, so he was not seen as much of a team player.

By all accounts he was well received by the primates, but he used his presence at Canterbury to continue is his war against the Episcopal Church and shamelessly manipulate the news media. 

In a television interview during the gathering, Beach pilloried the Episcopal Church with a slew of trumped up accusations that ACNA uses repeatedly to cast itself as a self-righteous victim of a brutal and out-of-control parent Church.

Beach blatantly complained, without any evidence, that the Episcopal Church was short-changing ACNA clergy on pensions they had earned as Episcopal priests. That earned him a sharp rebuke from the Church Pension Fund which by law cannot change the benefit structure under which retirement income for former clergy is calculated.   Beach apparently did not even understand how his own retirement system worked.

Of course, pensions are a luxury for clergy in many if not most Anglican provinces, so Beach's whining that he and his followers are not getting more money from the retirement system of the Church they abandoned most likely did not inspire a great deal of sympathy.

Beach also raised the issue of lawsuits in the U.S-based Church and claimed that he looked Presiding Bishop Michael Curry directly in the eye and demanded that he “stop the lawsuits” and compensate those ACNA congregations that lost their properties when they left the Episcopal Church. 

In fact, the Episcopal Church has never instigated any lawsuits against ACNA parishes except in response to legal steps taken by congregations and dioceses to leave the Church with property that rightfully belonged to the Church.

Of course, the biggest lawsuit that anyone has filed has been in South Carolina by breakaway ex-Bishop Mark Lawrence who claims he and his followers own the entire “Diocese of South Carolina” and its property and financial assets with an estimated value of $500-$800 million.

The value of Lawrence’s claim exceeds the entire combined value of all Church properties across the country currently claimed by breakaway groups.  Far from discouraging Lawrence in his legal quest, Beach has been his biggest cheerleader. 

Beach’s whining about lawsuits must have seemed a little disingenuous since many of the breakaway’s legal actions laying claim to Episcopal Church properties were financed by GAFCON provinces.  One of the most famous in our parts was Christ Episcopal Church in Savannah. 

Beach = Leaker?

Perhaps the final nail in the ACNA coffin, came on the fourth day of conference after “someone” leaked the news of the Primates imposition of “consequences” on the Episcopal Church to a pro-breakaway news site. 

Publication of a highly misinformed version of the decision set off a wave in international news stories variously suggesting that the Episcopal Church had been “sanctioned” "suspended" and even thrown out of the Communion. 

All fingers pointed to Foley as the leaker.  The story was published on Anglican Ink website under the name of George Conger, a notorious biased reporter who has for years been a mouthpiece for ACNA and other breakaway groups in the United States.

Beach has not said whether he was the source of the leak, but there is no question that Welby and most of the primates were enraged over the breach and the attempt to politicize the work going on among them. 

January 30, 2016
Welby's Woes Extend to his Own Church of England
By two-to-one, the English public supports same-gender marriage

month could go down as one of the most miserable for Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby.  Aside from managing the current groaning and travail in the worldwide Anglican Communion, the venerable Church of England, which he also leads, appears to be increasingly out of step with the people of England.

The Church's own statistics show that C of E membership has dipped below one million for the first time in modern record-keeping. Church members are dying off and the numbers of new baptisms, new members, and new clergy are not keeping pace.

This month's efforts by the Anglican Communion to punish the Episcopal Church for its embrace of same-gender marriage isn't likely to help

Last week a survey by YouGov, found that by a margin of 45%-37% people in England who claim to be Anglican, Episcopal, or Church of Englanders say they are okay with same-sex marriages.  Nearly three-quarters of young people in that group say it is fine with them. 

By an even wider margin, Englanders in general support same-gender marriage by 56%-27%.  Read the full story here

January 29, 2016
New Revelations Stun Loyal Anglicans
Failing to punish the Episcopal Church, most GAFCON Primates walked out of Canterbury gathering; 
ACNA representative left early as well

At a news conference on the final day of his historic gathering of Anglican primates two weeks ago, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby sounded upbeat about the prospects of a unified Anglican Communion "walking together" in the future. 

As proof, he brandished a final "communique" from the group outlining a global vision for the worldwide denomination that included addressing crises as diverse as hunger, refugees, and religious persecution, including that of gays and lesbians.

Asked why the leaders of the ultraconservative provinces of the Communion - known as GAFCON -  were not present, he explained they had flights to catch. 

Turns out that was not exactly what was happening.
  Read full story from ENS


January 27, 2016
Chaos in the Anglican Communion
by Dr. Ron Caldwell

Dr. Caldwell continues his thoughtful analysis of the issues raised by the recent actions of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Primates of the Anglican Communion.  Click here for his full commentary


January 22, 2016 (revised 1/26)
Primates' Meeting Ends After Imposing "Consequences" on the Episcopal Church
Primates dodge debate on homosexuality with focus on Church's failure to consult on same-sex marriage

Post-conference briefing
  provides more questions than answers

CANTERBURY - Last week Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby convened a kind of peace conference at Canterbury Cathedral to engage the fractious leaders of the 38 provinces of the Anglican Communion in discussions on the global challenges they are facing.  His hope was they'd find a way to move move beyond their bitter 13-year stalemate over human sexuality.

It was not an easy task. 

Over the past two years, Welby has traveled to each of the provinces to press his case for unity, and discourage disaffected “primates,” like those in Africa, from leaving the Communion altogether. 

He cancelled an every-ten-year conference of Anglican primates and bishops at Lambeth Palace when ultraconservative primates threatened to embarrass him by not showing up. They've even gone so far as to organize their own rival version of the Communion, known by the acronym GAFCON, to cultivate sympathizers and sabotage the Communion’s more modern-thinking elements
Click here to read full story

January 20, 2016

GAFFE-CON:  Foley Beach Misleads Primates on Church Pensions

Read full story here


January 18, 2016
Anglican Hypocrisy?
Lambeth 1988:  Marriage is also between one man and a few women

SC Episcopalians hates to bring this up when things are going so swimmingly for our Anglican brethren across the Pond. 

However, we just need to get this off our chests.

In their grand condemnation of the Episcopal Church last week, the Primates of the Anglican Communion affirmed their view that, "
The traditional doctrine of the church in view of the teaching of Scripture, upholds marriage as between a man and a woman in faithful, lifelong union."

Traditionalists rightly applauded.  Unfortunately for them, the actual tradition in the Anglican Communion is only sort of like that
.
 

Resolution 26

At the 1988 Lambeth Conference, the leaders of Communion agreed that marriage between a man and a woman is the "ideal," but in the real world there may be the need for a little flexibility

That's right.  It's called polygamy... and it's all part of that big Anglican family walking together over there.

According to Lambeth 1988, there are circumstances in which it is acceptable for an Anglican in good standing to be married to multiple wives at the same time.


Check it out to see if you qualify.

Back then the leaders of the African provinces believed the one-wife rule was frustrating their efforts to convert Muslim men who were allowed to have multiple wives.  It seems those pesky Muslims were actually posting signs all over the place that read: "Jesus: Three Gods, One Wife.  Allah: One God, Three Wives... Your Choice."

That's pretty much all it took for Anglicanism to broaden its view of the marriage "ideal".

Then there's the small print

Now before any of our readers get too excited, the participants at Lambeth imposed a few limitations on this rule. 

The first is that it only applies to men.  Women can't have multiple husbands as that would be immoral, of course. 

The second is that once you become an Anglican, you can't still go around grabbing up more wives.  You are limited to the wives you have when you join up.  So, plan ahead.

However, the third part of the deal is that when you convert, all your wives automatically convert over as well.  They don't really have a say.  This goes back to that old idea that women are more or less property and, apart from their husbands, not especially unique spiritual beings.

You might be surprised to learn there are many ardent advocates of polygamy in parts of the Anglican Communion and they will tell you that nowhere in the Bible does God condemn polygamy. 

In fact, they will point out that many of God's favorites - like Abraham and Solomon - were practicing polygamists.  Moses even told his male followers that those who were tempted to commit adultery should just find themselves a nice concubine from among their conquered peoples and make the most of a bad situation.

Makes for an interesting time at "family night" down at the local parish.  

Meanwhile, our point is that there is precedent in the Communion for bending the marriage "ideal" a bit to incorporate the political and cultural realities of the Communion's member provinces. 

At least that was the argument put forth by the polygamists' leading advocate in 1988... the Anglican Church of Uganda.
 
 

January 18, 2016
The Selective Outrage of the Anglican Church
by Jonathan Merritt in The Atlantic
Read full story here


January 14, 2016
GAFCON Primates Want Episcopalians Excluded from Anglican Communion Activities for Three Years
African Primates organize surprise attack at unofficial conference even though they lack authority

Presiding Bishop delivers moving defense of the Episcopal Church
Read full story here


January 14, 2016
Bishop vonRosenberg to Retire this Summer
Beloved Bishop of the Episcopal Church in South Carolina leaving an extraordinary legacy

South Carolina Bishop Charles vonRosenberg informed his Standing Committee this morning that he will step down as Provisional Bishop of the Episcopal Church in South Carolina, in mid-to-late summer. 

The retired Bishop of East Tennessee was elected in January 2013 following the sudden departure
of ex-Bishop Mark Lawrence, who quit the Episcopal Church and abandoned the Diocese in late 2012. 

Since that time, vonRosenberg has guided the wounded diocese through seemingly endless legal proceedings in state and Federal courts, fending off legal attacks from Lawrence and his followers and their claim to be owners of "The Diocese of South Carolina."
 

Lawrence and 36 parishes aligned with him filed a lawsuit against the Church and vonRosenberg's diocese just days before his election laying claim to parish property and diocesan assets valued at as much as $500 million.  

The case is now on appeal before the state's Supreme Court
.


Read Bishop vonRosenberg's letter to the Diocese

Diocese will consult with the Presiding Bishop on the way forward

The Diocese will consult with Presiding Bishop Michael Curry and his staff on the selection of vonRosenberg's successor, creating a process that likely will lead to the election of another "provisional" bishop to continue to rebuild the Diocese on the foundation vonRosenberg has established.

Provisional bishops normally serve until a diocese is strong enough to stand on its own and elect a "Diocesan" bishop.  Three years is usually considered a good run for a provisional bishop, and most of the breakaway dioceses have had a succession of them until they were ready to elect a "Diocesan" bishop. 

Meanwhile, the Standing Committee of the Diocese assumes the authority of the bishop when there is a vacancy in that office.  That could happen next summer as the next regularly scheduled Diocesan convention won't occur until the fall.  However, the Standing Committee are empowered to call a special convention to elect a new bishop if its members feel it is necessary.

Even so, the way forward will not be easy.


VonRosenberg's legacy  

During his tenure vonRosenberg has endured repeated attacks and humiliation at the hands of the breakaways.  Lawrence's attorneys repeatedly belittled "the foreign bishop" and in open court intentionally mangled the pronunciation of his name. He was variously vilified by Lawrence's lieutenants and spin doctors as a stooge for Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori.

Throughout the ordeal, vonRosenberg never publicly criticized Lawrence or any of the parishes that had chosen to follow him.  He insisted that his Diocese remain committed to the idea of reconciliation, and left the door slightly open for a process by which pro-Lawrence clergy could return to the priesthood even as he was "releasing" them from their ordination vows.

Following his election and installation, vonRosenberg led the wounded diocese for months from an office he shared with a third-grade Sunday School class at one of his Charleston parishes.  Lawrence and his cohorts had laid claim to everything that wasn't nailed down, including vonRosenberg's title as the "Episcopal Bishop of the Diocese of South Carolina."


Even today Lawrence still lives in the official Charleston residence of "the Episcopal Bishop of South Carolina. claiming that he is that person

With extraordinary patience, vonRosenberg rebuilt the Diocese from the ground up.  He recreated a Standing Committee and Diocesan Council, reorganized its deaneries with new leaders, and secured loans and donations to stabilize the Diocese's shaky infrastructure.  He even had to come up with a new name for the Diocese itself.  

VonRosenberg made history with the very popular appointment of the Ven. Calhoun Walpole as his Archdeacon.  She is the first woman to hold a diocesan office at this level in South Carolina.  

He presided over the formation of eight new mission parishes, formed by loyal Episcopalians who'd been run out of their home parishes by the Lawrencians.  He became the first bishop to celebrate the Eucharist at Po Pigs Barbeque on Edisto Island, the initial location of one of his budding mission parishes and home to one of the best BBQ buffets in the Sea Islands.

VonRosenberg reestablished relationships with Episcopal Church seminaries that the Lawrencans once feared as too liberal, and began sending students to them.  Last fall, vonRosenberg received approval from the Diocesan Convention to establish a new cathedral at historic Grace Church in downtown Charleston.  The former cathedral had cast its lot with Lawrence.

Of great significance was vonRosenberg's organization of an effective legal defense against Lawrence's attacks that would not run the Diocese into the red.  Lawrence's legal team at times included nearly 50 of the best and brightest of the state's law firms.

The wisdom of his strategy became apparent in September 2015 when the Chief Justice of the state' Supreme Court blasted a titanic hole in the central premise of Lawrence's lawsuit

Proposed settlement of Lawrence's lawsuit was historic

Much of vonRosenberg's success has been due to the widespread esteem in which he is held in the wider Church.

Last summer he persuaded Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori to sidestep the Church's long-standing refusal to even consider giving away Church property to dissident groups as part of a larger settlement offer to the Lawrencians.

VonRosenberg's plan, which she approved, was for the Church to withdraw any claim to the property and assets of pro-Lawrence parishes in exchange for their dropping their claims to the property and financial assets of the Diocese of South Carolina. 

One of the side benefits of the deal for the breakaway parishes was that they would not be liable for funds misspent by Lawrence, should state's Supreme Court find that he acted illegally in seizing and expending Diocesan assets that rightfully belong to the Episcopal Church. 

It was a win-win for all sides.  Astonishingly, none of the Lawrence parishes took the deal.

Read vonRosenberg's biography


January 12, 2016
Archbishop of Canterbury Seeks to Reel in Dissident Provinces
Breakaways and their allies take aim at Anglican unity with our-way-or-the-highway tactics

LONDON - Leaders of the Anglican Communion’s 38 provinces have gathered in London for an unusual five-day gathering, convened after two years of extensive prodding and lobbying by Archbishop Justin Welby.
 
The ABC is trying to restore unity to the Communion after years of bickering by its ultraconservative members, mostly from parts of Africa, Latin America, and Asia.   These provincial leaders, known as “Primates”, have spent years threatening to leave the Communion, if western provinces didn’t change their progressive ways, especially around issues of human sexuality.
 

Read more from the Episcopal New Service

Apparently seven of the Primates refused to attend the session if their brethren from the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Church of Canada were in attendance.  They want them to "repent" for their tolerance of gays and lesbians in their churches.  They are also unhappy over the role of women in the western provinces.

Welby apparently got dissidents to agree to attend by inviting the Rev. Folly Beach, the leader of the self-styled "Anglican Church of North America", to join the conclave for at least part of the time. 

The Most Reverend Michael Curry of the Episcopal Church and The Most Rev. Fred Hiltz of the Canadian Church were apparently willing to put up with the insult in order to help Welby out.

South Carolina breakaways cheer on Welby critics
 
With some hesitancy, SC Episcopalians provides the link above to the website of the breakaway "Diocese of South Carolina" and a posting by former Bishop Lawrence of a letter from Foley Beach.

We hesitate because it is filled with intentional inaccuracies that tend to make difficult situations even more intractable.  For example, Beach is not a "Primate."  That is simply a self-important title he appropriated for himself. In fact, Welby and his predecessor ABC have been very clear that the ACNA is not even part of the Anglican Communion, much less eligible to use its titles.  

He also refers to the Global Anglican Futures Conference (GAFCON) which is similarly not recognized by the Communion and his no authority to recognize anyone or anything as "Anglican."

His reference to a lack of "order" in the Anglican Communion is wholly disingenuous since it is he and the ultraconservative with whom he is in league who have created the disorder by boycotting Primates' Meetings and underwriting legal attacks on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Church of Canada (and now the Church of England) by breakaway groups.

January 8, 2016
First Dean of St. Luke & St. Paul Dies
Matt Currin:  "Dear All, I have gone to Glory!"

"The Good News of the Gospel is that God is mindful of us, each and every one of us, and those 'out there." What a glorious future our children have in store for them.  A New Age is dawning, and it staggers the imagination to think what goodness God has in store for His wonderful creation." -  Matt Currin in "Does God Still Speak to Us?"


Friends of The Rev. Beverly "Matt" Currin were only slightly surprised Friday when news of his earthly demise and arrival in Heaven came by way of an email blast … from Matt himself.

“I am no longer on this earth but in my heavenly home.  I look forward to seeing you all again one day.  Thank you for years of Friendship and Love.  Remember to always have Faith.  Continue to have Hope.  Lastly but most important Love one another,” he said.

Matt became the first Dean of the Cathedral of St. Luke and St. Paul in 1963 and one of many intellectual and theological giants drawn to the Diocese of South Carolina under its late Bishop, Gray Temple

Learn more about this remarkable Christian man

He left the Diocese in 1966 for Christ Church in Pensacola, Florida which grew to become the largest parish in the Diocese of the Gulf Coast. Its Episcopal Day School continues to turn out graduates marked with Currin's own brand of Christian hope and commitment.

According to one graduate, "The tales of his life bare an unintentional yet undeniable witness to the inestimable value of his lifelong service to the Episcopal Church, to Pensacola and its communities, to those like myself who ventured beyond armed with the awesome power of his educational convictions."

Matt and his beloved wife, Eleanor, never lost touch with their many friends and admirers in South Carolina.  She is a native of Pawleys Island and can be contacted at Matt's email address, mattcurrin31@gmail.com.

Matt was an avid reader of SC Episcopalians and grieved over the demise of the Diocese.  He was particularly disappointed that St. Luke & St. Paul voted to leave the Episcopal Church in 2012.  At the time of his departure from the Cathedral, there were over 800 active communicants in the congregation.

Read Matt Currin's obituary


December 28, 2015
Lynn Skilton & Martha Horn


Two remarkable women departed this life this week, and it would be a mistake not to note their passing.

The Reverend Martha Horn died today in Charleston.  There was no one more enthusiastic in proclaiming the Gospel than she.  Despite personal tragedy and a long painful struggle with cancer, Martha was tireless in her ministry and only seemed to grow stronger in her faith as challenges mounted.  Hers was a compassionate and encouraging voice to those whose earthly journey has not been easy.  It will be missed by many.  Her husband is the Reverend Robert Horn.

For 52 years Lynn Skilton was widely known as a partner in ministry and mission with her husband, the Rt. Rev. Bill Skilton, formerly the Suffragan Bishop of the Diocese of South Carolina and later Assistant Bishop of the Dominican Republic.  Lynn was a consistent friend and thoughtful mentor to many who knew and loved her. 

She was also a much beloved high school teacher in the Berkeley County school system.  Among the many tributes by former students, one seemed to sum up Lynn's role in their lives saying, "You gave me a fair chance when others wouldn't." 

Her funeral will be held Wednesday afternoon at Old St. Andrews near Charleston.


December 27, 2015
The Gift


It could be that among the next few postings on this site will be a report on the ruling of the South Carolina Supreme Court on ex-Bishop Lawrence's lawsuit laying claim to the "Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina" and 36 of its breakaway parishes and missions. 

Of course, SC Episcopalians has no inside knowledge that this is about to happen, but the justices have had the case for over three months and they seem to be dispensing with pending cases fairly quickly. 

Meanwhile, here's a very good idea for people on all sides to consider:  It would be very short-sighted to look at this decision in the context of winners and losers.  We have all lost and there is little any court can do now to change that.

Friendships have been broken, ministries have be disrupted, and hearts of once joyful congregations torn apart.  Millions of dollars for ministry have been hijacked to pay legal bills.  Longtime members have walked away from our fellowship, while visitors looking for a spiritual home have been repulsed by the vision of the Body of Christ at war with itself. 

Most sadly, the Gospel of Jesus Christ has lost an eloquent and powerful witness in this part of the world, and it will not be easily reconstructed or revived.

During this season of giving, it might be helpful for all of us to imagine this pending Court decision as a gift. 

Surely, clarity can be understood as a gift.  So can an invitation, beckoning us forward onto paths untraveled or even yet imagined.  To think otherwise would be to ignore all we understand about the nature of God and His Kingdom. 

Of course, the Court's ruling will mean hurt and confusion for many.  It will mean the end of that which is familiar and traditional for others, and inspire frustration with the courts, and disappointment with once trusted leaders and friends. 

However, little of that will matter if we imagine this gift as a kind of roadmap for moving ahead in our spiritual journey, and a framework for refocusing our attention away from property and onto ministry. 

Most importantly, this gift will give us the opportunity to reimagine ourselves in our true calling as a People of God - a uniquely divine Gift far beyond the reach of courtrooms, schisms, and church politics.

 

 

 

 

 

Website Builder